← All studies

Study 19 of 31

Influencing by Exposition

The clear, intellectual laying-bare of a subject

Hands-free narration of this study — good for the car.

Synopsis

Exposition is defined from the word 'expose' — to lay bare, to uncover, to show the true inwardness of a subject; it is explanation, distinct from description (which pictures), narration (which recounts events), and argument (which reasons to a conclusion). Because exposition is 'entirely an intellectual process, with no emotional element,' it cannot itself persuade, yet it is indispensable: it weaves a cord of understanding between speaker and audience and lays the factual foundation on which arguments and appeals are later built. The chapter warns of two opposite pitfalls — explaining too little, leaving the audience in doubt, and explaining too much, which insults their intelligence and drifts toward dulness. Clearness, precision, accuracy, unity, truth, and necessity are named as the constant standards of good exposition. A series of methods is then illustrated from literature and oratory: definition, contrast and antithesis, example, analogy, discarding, classification, analysis, division, generalization, and reference to experience — each a distinct road toward the same goal of making an idea unmistakably plain. The chapter closes with seven guiding questions a speaker should ask of any subject before attempting to expound it.

Key points

  • Exposition is explanation — the clear, precise setting forth of what a subject really is — distinct from description, narration, and argument.
  • Exposition is purely intellectual, with no emotional element, so 'the field of persuasion is not open to exposition.'
  • Two pitfalls bound good exposition: explaining too little (leaving doubt) and explaining too much (dulness and condescension).
  • The standards of exposition are clearness, precision, accuracy, unity, truth, and necessity.
  • Methods of exposition include definition, contrast, example, analogy, discarding, classification, analysis, division, generalization, and reference to experience.

Key texts

  • Nehemiah 8:8
  • Acts 8:30-35
  • Proverbs 25:11

From the book

Chapter XIX — Influencing by Exposition · Open the reader

  • “Exposition does not draw a picture, for that would be description.”
  • “it is obvious that the field of persuasion is not open to exposition, for exposition is entirely an intellectual process, with no emotional element.”
  • “To master the process of exposition is to become a clear thinker.”

Put it into practice

  • Before speaking, ask of your subject: what is it, and what is it not? what is it like, and unlike?
  • Estimate your audience's probable knowledge and avoid both under-explaining and tediously over-explaining.
  • Test every expository statement against clearness, precision, accuracy, unity, truth, and necessity.
  1. Comprehension

    1. How does the chapter define exposition, using the root of the word itself?

  2. Scripture

    2. Read the chapter's account of Peary's lecture. Which parts of it were exposition, description, narration, and argument?

  3. Doctrinal Clarity

    3. Why can exposition never by itself persuade an audience?

  4. Comprehension

    4. Name the six standards by which the chapter says exposition should be tested.

  5. Contrast

    5. Contrast the pitfall of explaining too little with that of explaining too much.

  6. Contrast

    6. Contrast Analysis and Division as methods of exposition.

  7. Comprehension

    7. What is 'Reference to Experience' and why is it valuable?

  8. Comprehension

    8. What seven questions does the chapter suggest asking of a subject to prepare expository material?

  9. Application

    9. Take a subject you often explain to others and test it against the six standards of clearness, precision, accuracy, unity, truth, and necessity.

  10. Application

    10. Practice 'Discarding' as a method: pick a complex topic and write one sentence that clears away a side issue so the main point stands out.